Public Administration-administrative Law

FACTSThis case involves the pupils in a Dade County Junior High naturalize who stimulate d for damages and declaratory relief with amaze a line to the allegations that the students were subjected to corporeal penalty which violated their organic rights .

The school room argued in response that such bodied punishment was allowed under(a) the regulations that were released authorizing such punishment to be carried out under nonindulgent specificationsISSUESThe head start issue here is whether or non the trifle of such corporal punishment falls under the morose on cruel and unusual punishment contained in the octad AmendmentThe second issue in this case is whether or non the ordinal Amendment requires key out and hearing before the imposition of corporal punishmentHELDAnent the first issue , the ultimate mash ruled that the ferine and unique Punishment Clause under the Eighth Amendment does not take to disciplinary corporal punishment in schools . The Supreme motor hotel reasoned that the jurisprudence has consistently maintained that the prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment only applies to harbor those who piddle been charged and convicted of crimesOn the second issue , the Supreme Court held that notice and hearing is not required for the imposition of the corporal punishment in public schools . The essential consideration in this proceeds is that the corporal punishment not exceed the limitations that ha ve been setINGRAHAM VS WRIGHT summon PAGE 1! of NUMPAGES 2...If you want to get a overflowing essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay